Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,478,122 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 40.2 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 38.0%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $58,624, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $94,982, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,123 compared to $41,131, a difference of 0.020%), median earnings ($45,596 compared to $45,641, a difference of 0.10%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $87,760, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.12%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 39.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 125.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 89.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 77.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 33.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 77.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.46%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%).