Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,319,983 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $81,489, a difference of 15.5%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,894, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $45,641, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $58,624, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,333, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $87,760, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 26.2%), single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.6%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 60.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.9%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 75.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.74%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%).