Czechoslovakian vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,352,317 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.321% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 321.3 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $52,391, a difference of 19.6%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $121,202, a difference of 17.4%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $99,389, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,266, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $68,037, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.82%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.5%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 48.9%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.4%).