Swedish vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,172,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,750 compared to $52,391, a difference of 14.5%), median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $44,695, a difference of 13.4%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $53,919, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $54,266, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $68,037, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.23%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and family households (64.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 71.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.8% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.4%).