Finnish vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,811,070 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,461 compared to $52,391, a difference of 20.5%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $99,389, a difference of 18.9%), and median family income ($102,676 compared to $121,202, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $54,266, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $68,037, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.6%), single female poverty (21.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.5%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 46.7%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%).