Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Turks

Fair
Exceptional
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,807,912 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 17.3 Turks.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Turkish Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $52,391, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $117,814, a difference of 28.9%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $121,202, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $54,266, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $44,695, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $68,037, a difference of 19.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 44.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 43.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.16, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Exceptional
27.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 75.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 57.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.32%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarTurkish
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%