Luxembourger vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,831,057 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.350% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 349.7 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,418 compared to $99,389, a difference of 15.0%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $52,391, a difference of 14.7%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $121,202, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,266, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $68,037, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.9%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 118.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.9%).