Luxembourger vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,443,662 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 12.1 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $83,588, a difference of 23.9%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $37,072, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $87,872, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $48,720, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $53,681, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 57.3%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 51.0%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 98.9%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 67.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 23.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.37, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 101.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.5%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 11.2%).