Romanian vs Shoshone Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Shoshone

Excellent
Fair
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Shoshone Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,622,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Shoshone.
Romanian Integration in Shoshone Communities

Romanian vs Shoshone Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $37,072, a difference of 30.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $83,588, a difference of 29.9%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $72,660, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $48,720, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $53,681, a difference of 19.5%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Income
Income MetricRomanianShoshone
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$37,072
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$87,872
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$72,660
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$40,932
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$47,930
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$34,677
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$48,720
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$82,062
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$83,588
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$53,681
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Good
25.4%

Romanian vs Shoshone Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 38.5%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.4%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianShoshone
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
25.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
12.4%

Romanian vs Shoshone Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 83.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 55.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.6%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianShoshone
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%

Romanian vs Shoshone Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianShoshone
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
39.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.3%

Romanian vs Shoshone Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.6%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.1%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianShoshone
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
35.3%

Romanian vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.39%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianShoshone
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
8.8%

Romanian vs Shoshone Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.6%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 54.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianShoshone
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
83.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
38.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
29.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
11.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Romanian vs Shoshone Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.9%).
Romanian vs Shoshone Disability
Disability MetricRomanianShoshone
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%