Uruguayan vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,429,507 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.927. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.192% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 192.3 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $37,072, a difference of 19.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $83,588, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $72,660, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $48,720, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $53,681, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 44.5%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 57.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 39.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.82%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.9%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 37.5%), and bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.8%).