Canadian vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,451,203 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 56.3 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $83,588, a difference of 25.1%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $37,072, a difference of 23.7%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $87,872, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $48,720, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $34,677, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.3%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 68.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.0%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 43.9%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 41.3%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 23.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), female disability (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%).