Immigrants from Oceania vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,126,213 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.530% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 530.5 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $83,588, a difference of 24.1%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $72,660, a difference of 22.6%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $37,072, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.82%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $48,720, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $34,677, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 48.4%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 34.4%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 76.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.7%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.30%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 3.8%).