Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,000,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $74,031, a difference of 32.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $129,122, a difference of 32.3%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $116,460, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $59,424, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $77,051, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 55.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.9% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 54.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%).