Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,925,661 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.346% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 346.0 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,965 compared to $116,460, a difference of 37.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $129,122, a difference of 35.8%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $74,031, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $59,424, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $49,256, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 45.1%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 35.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 39.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.6%), currently married (48.8% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (64.6% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 78.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 68.0%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 50.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%).