U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,442,243 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 234.1 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $135,508, a difference of 63.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $129,122, a difference of 63.6%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $116,460, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $59,424, a difference of 25.2%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $49,256, a difference of 35.2%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 126.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 99.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 98.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 30.2%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 43.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 83.9%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 72.0%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (62.6% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 99.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 62.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 43.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 116.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 93.0%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.0%).