Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 290,990,144 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $129,122, a difference of 53.3%), median household income ($77,631 compared to $116,460, a difference of 50.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $135,508, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $59,424, a difference of 22.0%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $49,256, a difference of 28.3%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 92.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 81.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.5%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 66.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 59.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 58.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 81.1%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 72.5%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 61.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.7%).