Choctaw vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,799,286 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.871. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 198.9 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $116,460, a difference of 66.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $129,122, a difference of 65.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $135,508, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $59,424, a difference of 30.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $77,051, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 102.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 93.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 90.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 40.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 61.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 60.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 50.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 121.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 119.0%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (96.2% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 109.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 94.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 86.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 15.7%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.6%).