U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,640,250 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.608% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 607.8 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $58,375, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $91,293, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($85,294 compared to $93,593, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $47,916, a difference of 0.99%), wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $37,965, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and single female poverty (24.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 13.3%), single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 51.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.71%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.8%).