Romanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,279,229 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to a decrease of 27.1 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $82,254, a difference of 24.7%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $39,529, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $37,965, a difference of 9.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $58,375, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $47,916, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.2%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 21.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%).