Scottish vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,493,312 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 57.2 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $82,254, a difference of 15.0%), and median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $49,201, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $37,965, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $47,916, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $58,375, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.68%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.2%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and associate's degree (46.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.3%).