Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,852,743 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 70.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $82,254, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $49,201, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $37,965, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $58,375, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,916, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.0%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.2%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 48.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%).