New Zealander vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,122,108 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.343% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 342.9 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,529, a difference of 27.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $82,254, a difference of 27.8%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $49,201, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,916, a difference of 11.2%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $37,965, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $58,375, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.2%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%).