Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Crow
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Crow

Immigrants from Congo

Fair
Fair
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Congo Integration in Crow Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,656,090 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 55.7 Immigrants from Congo.
Crow Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.8%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $35,720, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $43,266, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $72,178, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $39,169, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $34,317, a difference of 2.8%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Income
Income MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,729
Tragic
$35,720
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,605
Tragic
$82,216
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,681
Tragic
$66,768
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,707
Tragic
$39,169
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,434
Tragic
$44,204
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,266
Tragic
$34,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,012
Tragic
$43,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$71,337
Tragic
$72,178
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,257
Tragic
$77,850
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,234
Tragic
$51,393
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
21.7%

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 96.8%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 67.7%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (26.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.2%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
Poverty MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
Poverty
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Families
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
24.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
23.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
22.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
22.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Males
Tragic
23.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
33.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.1%

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 274.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 267.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 231.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.1%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
Unemployment
Tragic
11.1%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
10.6%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
12.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.0%

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.3%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
75.9%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
76.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
81.6%

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.0%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.23, a difference of 18.4%), and family households (65.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.18%), currently married (40.4% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.4%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.82
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
36.8%

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.8%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.3%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.7%
Tragic
52.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.2%

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.8%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.83%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
Education Level MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.7%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.7%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
99.5%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
99.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
99.1%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
Disability MetricCrowImmigrants from Congo
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.6%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%