Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,983,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 15.7 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $72,178, a difference of 16.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $77,850, a difference of 16.5%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $66,768, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $51,393, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $34,317, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.43%), single male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and female unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (41.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 6.6%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.63%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.37%), male disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.50%).