Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Congo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Congo
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,546,918 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.810. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.498% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 497.6 Immigrants from Congo.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $72,178, a difference of 35.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $77,850, a difference of 34.9%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $66,768, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $43,266, a difference of 20.0%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $34,317, a difference of 21.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Tragic $35,720 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Tragic $82,216 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Tragic $66,768 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Tragic $39,169 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Tragic $44,204 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Tragic $34,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Tragic $43,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Tragic $72,178 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Tragic $77,850 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Tragic $51,393 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 50.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 50.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 24.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 23.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 22.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 22.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 13.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 33.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 41.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.6%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 59.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 39.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 41.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 36.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.22%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Tragic 52.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 44.7%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.60%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 92.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 90.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Tragic 61.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Tragic 41.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Tragic 33.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 25.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Congo |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 26.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 19.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |