Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,489,489 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Cabo Verde communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cabo Verde within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cabo Verde corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,304 compared to $72,178, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,520 compared to $43,266, a difference of 16.8%), and median male earnings ($50,009 compared to $44,204, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($87,830 compared to $82,216, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,542 compared to $77,850, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($38,540 compared to $35,720, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (23.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 68.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 48.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 83.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 57.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 83.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (81.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (43.3% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 3rd grade (96.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.5%), self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.5%).