Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,585,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $72,178, a difference of 24.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $43,266, a difference of 21.6%), and median household income ($80,402 compared to $66,768, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $51,393, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $82,216, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 34.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.2%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and family households (63.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.89%), currently married (41.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 136.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).