Pima vs Cheyenne Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Cheyenne
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Pima
Cheyenne
20.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Cheyenne Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,152,261 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,255,059 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 25.1%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Cheyenne |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 13.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 93.5% | 86.7% |
| Mean | 37.5% | 44.4% |
| Median | 28.6% | 38.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.7% | 60.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 41.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.2% | 30.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.5% | 29.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Cheyenne by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Native/Alaskan (19.6%, a difference of 2.7%), Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 4.4%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and Colville (18.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |