Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,483,936 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 21.0 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $52,044, a difference of 18.8%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $44,680, a difference of 15.3%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $53,457, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,512, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $55,891, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.0%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 92.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.7%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.87%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%).