Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Serbians

Good
Excellent
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,624,767 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 37.4 Serbians.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Serbian Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $46,551, a difference of 6.3%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $57,975, a difference of 4.7%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $40,539, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,106, a difference of 0.23%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,087, a difference of 0.83%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.4%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.23%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.76%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Good
30.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
6.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.3%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.1% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Excellent
2.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianSerbian
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%