Czechoslovakian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,843,245 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.247% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 246.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $72,093, a difference of 40.6%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 37.1%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $62,575, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $50,547, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $44,356, a difference of 15.5%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $38,949, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 82.7%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 75.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 31.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 72.1%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.3%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 45.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 86.9%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 83.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 58.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.6%).