Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia

Good
Good
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 352,429,283 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 16.2 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $55,714, a difference of 8.8%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $91,541, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $55,241, a difference of 0.25%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $43,539, a difference of 0.62%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $47,671, a difference of 2.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Average
$43,539
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Excellent
$106,252
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Exceptional
$91,541
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Excellent
$47,671
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Good
$55,241
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Excellent
$40,558
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$55,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Exceptional
$100,283
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Exceptional
$106,109
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$64,089
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
24.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.9%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.50%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.75%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Excellent
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
27.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
11.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.33%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Excellent
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Average
82.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.36, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.27%), currently married (48.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
67.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Excellent
30.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.6%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 6.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
59.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 78.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
92.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
84.1%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Fair
36.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Poor
1.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.8%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Poor
2.5%