Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,023,540 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.995. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 121.0 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $57,074, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $93,933, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $54,958, a difference of 0.77%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $42,694, a difference of 2.6%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $106,544, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.1%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.6%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.0%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (48.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 116.4%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 64.8%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.6%).