Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Swedes

Good
Excellent
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,222,842 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.538% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 537.9 Swedes.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Swedish Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($103,273 compared to $108,499, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $106,377, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $45,750, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,421, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $47,851, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,986, a difference of 3.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
29.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.59%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 8.1%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.90%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Exceptional
29.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Excellent
2.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.7%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.41%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianSwedish
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%