Czechoslovakian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,890,130 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 210.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $87,255, a difference of 16.2%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $74,279, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $90,543, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $36,408, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $42,430, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.97%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.1%).