Czechoslovakian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,393,176 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 34.2 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $88,115, a difference of 15.1%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $38,120, a difference of 14.9%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $48,254, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $49,364, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $56,339, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.4%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.32%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 45.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).