Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Jordanians

Good
Exceptional
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Jordanian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,995,127 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.829. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 89.1 Jordanians.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Jordanian Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,965 compared to $91,794, a difference of 8.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $109,376, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $41,464, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,796, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $45,605, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $99,186, a difference of 4.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Excellent
$45,605
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Exceptional
$109,865
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Exceptional
$91,794
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Exceptional
$49,632
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Exceptional
$58,500
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Exceptional
$41,464
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Exceptional
$99,186
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Exceptional
$109,376
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$64,313
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
26.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.8%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.3%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.26%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
65.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Exceptional
28.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.6%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Excellent
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
87.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
49.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Jordanian Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianJordanian
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%