Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 341,073,032 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 75.1 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,268, a difference of 5.9%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $100,414, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,658 compared to $46,548, a difference of 0.24%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $44,068, a difference of 0.60%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $85,611, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.2%), currently married (48.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.26%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%).