Czechoslovakian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,439,878 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 245.9 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.1%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $98,660, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,965 compared to $84,691, a difference of 0.32%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $46,190, a difference of 1.0%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $44,318, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.7%), currently married (48.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.26%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.72%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).