Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,018,329 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 141.5 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $40,977, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $89,412, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,370, a difference of 0.29%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $97,185, a difference of 2.2%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $45,066, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.6%).