Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Pakistanis

Good
Good
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pakistani Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,739,145 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 55.6 Pakistanis.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Pakistani Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.2%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $89,638, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $63,844, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $56,719, a difference of 2.4%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $48,254, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $98,401, a difference of 3.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Excellent
$45,587
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Exceptional
$107,390
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Exceptional
$89,638
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Exceptional
$48,254
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Excellent
$56,719
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Excellent
$40,596
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$53,325
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Excellent
$98,401
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Exceptional
$105,317
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$63,844
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
26.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.25%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.2%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Excellent
37.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Average
82.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 5.1%), currently married (48.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Excellent
30.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
61.5%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Excellent
48.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Excellent
39.7%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pakistani Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianPakistani
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Good
2.4%