Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Italy
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Immigrants from Italy

Good
Good
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,138
SOCIAL INDEX
78.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
85th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Italy Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,893,580 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.947. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.095% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 1,094.6 Immigrants from Italy.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Italy Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $48,654, a difference of 11.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $105,201, a difference of 10.7%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $93,465, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,065, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,449, a difference of 6.3%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Exceptional
$48,654
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Exceptional
$112,848
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Exceptional
$93,465
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Exceptional
$50,581
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Exceptional
$59,691
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$54,449
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Exceptional
$105,201
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Exceptional
$110,434
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$64,065
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Poor
26.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.7%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Exceptional
29.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 16.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Poor
18.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
6.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
41.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Italy Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Italy
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Good
2.4%