Czechoslovakian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,982,848 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.772. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 9.746% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 9,746.0 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $30,256, a difference of 44.8%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $72,193, a difference of 43.0%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $39,543, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $45,248, a difference of 13.2%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $33,205, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $49,121, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 157.9%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 154.9%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 121.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 28.9%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 44.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 55.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 104.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.7%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 64.6%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 55.6%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 99.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 51.6%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 49.5%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.1%).