Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Cajun
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Cajuns
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cajun Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,450,587 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.520% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 520.0 Cajuns.
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $83,015, a difference of 22.1%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $70,605, a difference of 20.3%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $52,325, a difference of 5.8%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $42,189, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $45,338, a difference of 13.0%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $37,527 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $87,157 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $70,605 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $42,189 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Poor $52,325 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $34,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Tragic $45,338 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $82,393 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $83,015 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $51,397 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 33.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 28.6%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 24.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 22.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 30.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 40.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 78.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 27.9%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Excellent 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 41.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 57.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.3%), bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 89.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 87.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 82.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 57.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 37.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 29.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Cajun Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 8.7%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Cajun |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 50.7% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |