Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,608,900 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 88.5 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 49.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $87,035, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $89,268, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $38,625, a difference of 0.29%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,038, a difference of 0.36%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $43,026, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 64.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 30.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.080%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 81.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.56%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.2%).