Czechoslovakian vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,181,859 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 114.5 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $46,700, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,335, a difference of 6.1%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,465, a difference of 1.5%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $56,837, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $104,408, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.3%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.2%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.8%).