Czechoslovakian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,168,817 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.253% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 253.2 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 45.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $91,357, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $55,327, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,820, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,631, a difference of 2.8%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $41,655, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 55.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 50.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 37.5%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 35.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.1%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 203.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 67.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 21.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 59.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%).