Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Tsimshian

Good
Average
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,374,291 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.975. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.542% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 1,542.4 Tsimshian.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.1%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $40,344, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,273 compared to $101,543, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $83,346, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,530, a difference of 2.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
23.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 154.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 81.3%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
77.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
42.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
6.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.3%), bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianTsimshian
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%