Czechoslovakian vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,779,388 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.756. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 210.9 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $89,811, a difference of 12.9%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $76,387, a difference of 11.2%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $92,872, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $48,977, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $36,920, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $43,333, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 31.0%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.8%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.3%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 7.5%).