Czechoslovakian vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,595,732 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.079% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 79.0 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $29,031, a difference of 50.9%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $70,989, a difference of 45.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $69,759, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $33,046, a difference of 17.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $42,380, a difference of 20.9%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 172.5%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 135.1%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 115.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 35.2%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 48.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 51.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 105.0%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 98.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 95.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 60.7%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 50.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 56.7%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 44.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.3%).